This blog is devoted to a bad habit of mine, looking at photographs of facial cosmetic surgery. I'm interested in facial feminization surgery (FFS) as well. I know. I need a new hobby.
Showing posts with label femininity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label femininity. Show all posts
Friday, November 7, 2014
Bruce Jenner Looking More Feminine
So Bruce Jenner has ruined his nice eyebrows by tweezing them, but I don't think it makes him look more feminine. Just weird. That said, I was trying to figure out what I could do to make him look more feminine. Here's my first attempt. I gave him more hair, opened up his eyes, raised his eyebrows, gave him bigger lips, and shrunk his jaw.
Monday, April 29, 2013
Ode to Straight Noses - Part 7
More straight noses (reminders that if FFS doctors say you need to have a scooped nose to be beautiful, it is not true).
![]() |
Jenna Elfman (she is not beautiful straight on, but is picture perfect in profile) |
![]() |
Loretta Young (she was an actress long, long ago) |
![]() |
This is just a post card. I have no clue who the woman is but thought she had a pretty straight nose. |
![]() |
Just a random photo off the internet, but her profile is lovely. |
![]() |
Mischa Barton |
![]() |
Nicole Scherzinger. Too turned up for my tastes, but definitely straight. |
Friday, April 12, 2013
Ode to Straight Noses - Part 6 (straight profiles by artists)
Charles Dana Gibson
This is Gibson Girl. She is gorgeous. I don't think she could be any more feminine. Feminine, but adult. Not child-like. Full lips, small mouth, beautifully shaped face, perfect nose, high cheekbones... She was the personification of the ideal woman of his era, but I think she could be the ideal for an era with that bone structure.![]() |
Charles Dana Gibson's Gibson Girl |
![]() |
The Gibson Girl in profile (notice the straight nose) |
Harrison Fisher
Harrison Fisher was an artist known for his illustrations of beautiful women. This is what the man did for a living. He drew beautiful women.![]() | |
A very beautiful woman as drawn by the illustrator Harrison Fisher. |
![]() |
Another Harrison Fisher illustration (although this woman has a tiny bump on the bridge). Clearly beautiful though. Clearly feminine. |
McClelland Barclay
He was another illustrator. I just thought I'd include this since it shows a comparison between a masculine and the feminine nose.![]() | ||
Feminine and masculine noses (both straight) by McClelland Barclay |
Thutmose
This is Nefertiti, as portrayed by an artist well over 3,300 years ago. It is believed that the sculptor is Thutmose. Anyway, Nefertiti was an Egyptian queen known for her beauty (as if this wasn't obvious).![]() |
Nefertiti - 3,300 year-old proof that straight noses have always been considered beautiful =) |
Labels:
art,
beauty,
Charles Dana Gibson,
cosmetic surgery,
femininity,
Harrison Fisher,
illustrators,
masculinity,
McClelland Barclay,
Nefertiti,
noses,
plastic surgery,
Profiles,
straight noses,
The Gibson Girl,
Thutmose
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Christina Ricci with a forehead reduction - Better? Worse? Masculine? Feminine?
This probably isn't the best photo to start with since Ms. Ricci's hairline looks kind of crooked, one eyebrow looks higher than the other and her smile is leaning one direction too, but here she is...
Does she look less masculine? Some FFS doctors say that women have lower hairlines (although this is not true). So if you believe that, then she should look more feminine, right? But to me her masculinity/femininity seems unchanged. She looks better to me, but not more feminine. I think this is because her hairline has a feminine shape to it. It's not receding at the corners at all.
One thing that COULD affect masculinity and femininity when lowering a hairline is how the overall proportions of her face change. If Christina had a long chin, and we made her hairline lower, her chin would look longer in relation to her forehead. As an example, here's Bill Clinton.
Mr. Clinton has a long chin, but it's somewhat balanced out by his tall forehead. It's not the first thing you notice when you look at him. But when you make his forehead smaller, the focal point of his face changes and the balance goes off kilter. He, like Christina Ricci, does not look more feminine with a lower hairline. If anything, I think he looks more masculine with that big chin.
![]() |
Christina Ricci "before" (with her naturally high forehead) and "after" (with a shorter forehead) |
Does she look less masculine? Some FFS doctors say that women have lower hairlines (although this is not true). So if you believe that, then she should look more feminine, right? But to me her masculinity/femininity seems unchanged. She looks better to me, but not more feminine. I think this is because her hairline has a feminine shape to it. It's not receding at the corners at all.
One thing that COULD affect masculinity and femininity when lowering a hairline is how the overall proportions of her face change. If Christina had a long chin, and we made her hairline lower, her chin would look longer in relation to her forehead. As an example, here's Bill Clinton.
![]() |
Bill Clinton "before", with his natural hairline, and "after", with a lower one. |
Mr. Clinton has a long chin, but it's somewhat balanced out by his tall forehead. It's not the first thing you notice when you look at him. But when you make his forehead smaller, the focal point of his face changes and the balance goes off kilter. He, like Christina Ricci, does not look more feminine with a lower hairline. If anything, I think he looks more masculine with that big chin.
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Jennifer Aniston without George Clooney's chin
![]() |
George Clooney and his very masculine chin |
Ever wonder how Jennifer Aniston would look without that chin? Me too. I've even checked out photos of her parents. Neither one of them has it. Anyway, below is the by-product of my curiosity... more before and after photos. Notice that in the "after" photo, her chin is:
- shorter
- pointier
- an extension of her jawline instead of a protrusion from it
![]() |
Jennifer Aniston "before" Photoshop surgery (with her natural, masculine-shaped, square, long chin) and "after" (with a pointier, shorter, more feminine chin) |
Saturday, December 22, 2012
High prenatal androgens cause boys to tilt their heads up when having their photos taken... or, Are square jaws a masculine trait? - Part 2
I was just looking at the abstract for the article "Second-to-fourth digit ratio and facial shape in boys: the lower the digit ratio, the more robust the face" by Meindl, Windhager, et al., and also looking at the accompanying photos which can be seen in an earlier post or here. And although I don't have access to the article, so cannot be sure, based on what I can see I'd say that the methods were faulty and the results should just be thrown out. The photographs were not taken consistently, which means they have no baseline to work from. No baseline means crap data.
In the first image below, the boy's head is tilted down and his ears line up at his eyebrows. In the middle photo, his ears line up below the eyebrows, and in the last photo his ears line up with his eyes. The difference can be seen by looking at his nose, too.
What does this mean? It means I should start moonlighting writing scholarly articles for Proceedings of the Royal Society :) The image below shows the photographic evidence from the 2012 article, but with Angelina Jolie's face where the little boy face should go.
So, in a nutshell, the 2012 article's results cannot be trusted (just my opinion, of course). The 2005 article appears legit though, which would mean that higher levels of prenatal androgens result in a squarer, broader face whereas lower prenatal androgens result in a pointier chin and a face that is less square overall (longer than it is wide).
To be continued....
In the first image below, the boy's head is tilted down and his ears line up at his eyebrows. In the middle photo, his ears line up below the eyebrows, and in the last photo his ears line up with his eyes. The difference can be seen by looking at his nose, too.
![]() |
Here's a clue. It's not prenatal androgens. |
What does this mean? It means I should start moonlighting writing scholarly articles for Proceedings of the Royal Society :) The image below shows the photographic evidence from the 2012 article, but with Angelina Jolie's face where the little boy face should go.
Also, I returned to check the 2005 article and it doesn't include ears in the images so I cannot guess the accuracy of its findings. Under the 'Methods' section it says it just asked the men to look straight ahead. But its drawings don't have the telltale signs of inconsistency shown in the 2012 article. For example:
- In the first image (shown above), the boys nose is pointy, in the last it isn't.
- In the first image, the eyebrows are straignter (much like Angelina's) and the last image they are more arched (like Angelina's).
- In the first image the mouth is curved up, in the middle straight across, and in the last one curved down (again, like Angelina's)..
So, in a nutshell, the 2012 article's results cannot be trusted (just my opinion, of course). The 2005 article appears legit though, which would mean that higher levels of prenatal androgens result in a squarer, broader face whereas lower prenatal androgens result in a pointier chin and a face that is less square overall (longer than it is wide).
To be continued....
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Are square jaws a masculine trait?
Recently I was asked my opinion on square jaws by a reader of this blog. I really didn't know where to start though. I thought I knew what the reader was getting at, but didn't think there was a good enough definition for the term, really. Sometimes "square" seems to refer to a square shaped face and at other times a defined jaw line.
What "square" means in the fields of medicine and anthropology...
But John Hawks, a paleoanthropologist and professor of anthropology, has a web site that gets to the point nicely. The angle of a person's jaw, shown below, differs somewhat between men and women. "In males, the angle [sic] is closer to 90 degrees. In females, this angle is greater, up to 110 -120 degrees." Hence the term "square jawed", I would assume.
Other articles say this isn't a reliable determinant of gender though. Ethnicity and other factors play a role in determining the gonial angle. But since these articles are written by forensic anthropologists, their interest lies in being able to determine sex from skeletal remains. Our interests are different. We are looking at people face to face so have visual clues regarding age and ethnicity.
Jaw angle does affect face shape...
Another thing I learned from reading books on anthropology and forensic facial reconstruction is that the gonial angle definitely does affect that shape of one's face from the front. The squarer the jaw, the more likely the person will have a round or square face, as opposed to an oval or triangle-shaped face.
Androgens affect face shape...
We know this. We can SEE this. But here are some articles that show the difference prenatal testosterone makes. When a person's ring finger is longer than his or her index finger, this results in a lower 2D:4D ratio (2nd digit to 4th digit ratio) which signifies higher androgen exposure in the womb.
To be continued...
What "square" means in the fields of medicine and anthropology...
But John Hawks, a paleoanthropologist and professor of anthropology, has a web site that gets to the point nicely. The angle of a person's jaw, shown below, differs somewhat between men and women. "In males, the angle [sic] is closer to 90 degrees. In females, this angle is greater, up to 110 -120 degrees." Hence the term "square jawed", I would assume.
![]() |
mandibular or gonial angle |
Other articles say this isn't a reliable determinant of gender though. Ethnicity and other factors play a role in determining the gonial angle. But since these articles are written by forensic anthropologists, their interest lies in being able to determine sex from skeletal remains. Our interests are different. We are looking at people face to face so have visual clues regarding age and ethnicity.
Jaw angle does affect face shape...
Another thing I learned from reading books on anthropology and forensic facial reconstruction is that the gonial angle definitely does affect that shape of one's face from the front. The squarer the jaw, the more likely the person will have a round or square face, as opposed to an oval or triangle-shaped face.
Androgens affect face shape...
We know this. We can SEE this. But here are some articles that show the difference prenatal testosterone makes. When a person's ring finger is longer than his or her index finger, this results in a lower 2D:4D ratio (2nd digit to 4th digit ratio) which signifies higher androgen exposure in the womb.
'Manly' Fingers Make For Strong Jawline in Young Boys (Note that this 2012 study had a very small sample size of 17. See the abstract here.)
![]() |
Less prenatal androgens resulted in a more feminine, triangular, face shape, as seen on the left. This differs greatly from the masculine face, which is square-shaped. |
Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape (2005 study of 106 volunteers)
Again, the more prenatal exposure to androgens, as seen on the far left, the squarer the face shape. |
To be continued...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)